Pass Ed's Living Textbook
Free Lesson Plans for Teachers
Alpha Stage






MSNBC and other news organizations reporting that yesterday the
United States House of Representatives voted to give President Bush,
and obviously his representatives, authority to listen to/read telephone
conversations or emails made between a person on American territory
and a person outside this territory, without a warrant.

The article reports that:
Under the measure, the president would be authorized to conduct such
wiretaps if he:
A. Notifies the House and Senate intelligence committees and
congressional leaders
B. Believes an attack is imminent and later explains the reason and
names the individuals and groups involved.
C. Renews his certification every 90 days.

The Senate now takes up action on the legislation. House and Senate
leaders do not believe that they will be able to draft a final resolution
before the November break.

Read a related article!!  

Discussion Starters

  • With younger children it might be interesting to ask them if
    they think it's ok to listen in on a conversation between two
    people, in general. Encourage them to share their opinions.
    Then ask the children if it's ok to listen in on a conversation
    between two people if the two people are planning on hurting
    somebody else and the reason that you are listening in is to
    prevent the other person from being hurt?

  • According to the current interpretation of the U.S. Constitution
    law enforcement officials are not allowed to eavesdrop on
    conversations without a warrant. However, now the House of
    Representatives is saying that they can listen in on these
    conversations if they believe that the security of the United
    States is at risk and the conversation takes place across national
    borders. Ask students to write a persuasive argument, perhaps
    blog a persuasive argument, as to whether or not they believe
    that law enforcement officials should have this authority. Since
    the Senate has not yet taken up this issue, you might invite
    students to send their letters to your senators.

  • If you live outside the United States is this decision by the
    American government any of your concern? Are decisions
    made by European nations important to U.S. Citizens?
    Why/why not?  It might be really interesting to have a virtual
    conversation with a class in another country on this topic.  
    Epals.com is a great source for finding partner classes.

  • The government of the United States of America was founded
    on the principles that individual rights are sacred. Individuals
    should not be deprived of their rights without due cause and
    process for any reason. Other nations, such as China, believe
    that society as a whole is far more important than any
    particular individual. Therefore, if it's to the advantage of
    society in China individuals can be deprived of their rights. Ask
    your students to draw a comic strip in which they explore
    these two different perspectives. Ask students if they think that
    one form of government is better than the other? Why?
Wiretapping
August 18, 2006
Google