On Friday afternoon, July 14
th, the United States Department of Education released a report
“Comparing Private Schools and Public Schools Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling.” This report compared math and reading scores earned by fourth and eighth graders in public schools to those scored earned by similar aged students in private schools.
Affluent students in the best private schools did outscore their typical age-mates in the public school system. However, when the study held socio-economic conditions and family backgrounds constant the results proved very interesting.
With regards to fourth grade reading scores, the report found little difference between private schools, that like to refer to themselves as “prep schools,” or schools that better prepare students for college, and public schools. Students in public schools outperformed their private school counterparts in fourth grade math. Perhaps the wrong schools are called “prep.”
Eighth grade private, but not parochial, school students did demonstrate better reading skills than their public school counterparts. Performance in parochial schools equaled that in public schools. Once again public school students performed as well as private school students in eighth grade math.
Significantly, students in Conservative Christian schools never scored above public school students.
It’s clear that public schools are holding their own against private schools. But, smart educational pundits are not celebrating these scores. Instead, they are emphasizing that they merely demonstrate that all schools need improvement.
This was last week’s news.
But, it gets a whole lot better:
On Tuesday, July 18th, Congressional Republicans joined by Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings proposed legislation to develop a $100 million voucher program that would enable students in low achieving public schools to attend private and religious schools.
Certainly, if these vouchers enabled the students the opportunity to attend the highest quality private schools students might truly benefit. After all, students who can afford expensive private school tuitions did demonstrate higher achievement than their public school peers.
But, students who attend the lowest performing public schools likely cannot afford the best private schools’ tuition costs. Tuitions in these schools range from $15,000 to $25,000. Vouchers of three or four thousand dollars will not begin to enable economically deprived students to attend the nation’s best private schools.
Instead, these vouchers will typically enable students to attend inner-city parochial schools – the types of schools that did not fare as well as public schools in the recent investigation.
It’s as if educational policymakers are saying, “Your own school isn’t good. We’ll help you pay for a different bad education.”
The Real Loser:
If this proposed legislation passed, high quality secular education would be the real loser. For, if Congress doesn’t approve this voucher program, it might instead invest this $100 million to fund inner-city school improvement efforts. This investment would promote higher quality rather than sub-par education.
How does one explain this policy proposal?
Only one thing can explain the policymakers’ motivation. The sponsors of this legislation are not looking to promote the quality of education that students receive. They are simply seeking to promote their chances of re-election in November.
The sponsors of this legislation are reaching out to their Christian-Right constituencies. The policymakers recognize that right wing Christians place great value on religious education. They want their children to be educated religiously. They don’t want their children to receive public education. Secular education is less important to these constituencies than religious education.
Consequently, this voucher proposal satisfies the needs of Christian-Right constituencies. These same constituencies don’t put a whole lot of credence into a report entitled, “Comparing Private Schools and Public Schools Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling.”